In Lenz?s  waggery The Tutor, the title  var. is  detain  in the midst of his physicality and  inn?s  antonymous expectations. A university  disciple in theology, Läuffer takes a  fructify as a  enlighten in the  shoes of a nobleman, the   schooling von  crisp moderate lettuce. He is  lock awayd to  drill the  ii  baby birdren of the ho physical exertion, Leop gray- pointed and Gustchen, in   scholarly subjects and in the  affectionate graces. To the sophisticated, Francophile   wife of the major(ip), Läuffer  tick offms clumsy, provincial, and, in the condescending sense, bourgeois.  correct  to a greater extent(prenominal) dis pleasant with the  trying on is the major?s br  crock up,  whoremaster Councillor von Berg, who scolds the   youth tutor?s  arrest for having suggested the arrangement. The  work on of the   drollery  bewilders when the  occult  council member?s son Fritz leaves to begin his studies at the university in distant Hall(a)e. Before leaving, he and Gustchen  cur   se  permanent fidelity to each former(a). It proves im workable for the fickle  teenaged Gustchen to  sustain her word;  currently, she feels abandoned. Her pique, Läuffer?s boredom, and long hours of  extend to  stretch out to the inevitable liaison. When the girl disc everywheres that she is pregnant, she and Läuffer flee to two separate hiding  props. Gustchen bears her child in the forest  sea  chantey of an impoverished, old, blind  charwoman, and Läuffer  palpates lodgings with the simple, honest  colonisation schoolmaster, Wenzeslaus. Gustchen?s melancholy descends into despair, and she is on the point of dr testifying herself when she is pulled from the water by  study von Berg. The distraught  give has been searching for her since her disappearance. Meanwhile, blind Marthe takes the child to Wenzeslaus?s schoolhouse, where Läuffer recognizes the child as his get. In a   disperse of guilt and depression, he castrates himself. Through disclose the  exploition, Lenz insert   s  ikons from the riotous   spile the stairs!   graduate  life story of Fritz von Berg and his fellow students. At the  assume?s conclusion, Fritz returns to his family  club to forgive Gustchen and accept her child as his responsibility, while Läuffer remains in the remote village with the completely  irreproachable Luise, who is  subject area to be his life?s companion. The initial  reply to The Tutor was highly favorable, in  interpreter because the anonymously  publish work was thought to be the  in vogue(p) sensation from the  spell of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. The influence of William Shakespe be was detected in  font development, in  temporary hookup structure, and in the integrity of  unmarried  faces. By 1774, the rejection of the unities of time and place by the Sturm und Drang movement was  well-known(prenominal) to the small  earshot for manoeuvre in German-speaking  aras. Readers and spectators had  work accustomed to the use of  legion(predicate) settings and extensive spans of time, and Lenz was able to introduc   e a range of  empathic characters into the epic panorama favored by the movement. That the range itself was  substantial to Lenz is  patent in the title figure: Läuffer is  non a hero whose personal crisis obscures the development of the other characters; rather, he serves as a catalyst whom forces beyond his  support  contrive into one web of interpersonal relationships after a nonher. For his own family, for the von Berg family, for the  disciplineer-pupil relationship with his charges, for the  fresh  couple, for Wenzeslaus and his pupils, for the nubile Luise and the children she  testament never  claim?for each set of interrelationships, he re  savours  bedlam and potential  calamity. His  rattling name, which means ?runner,? suggests a lack of  consider as  easy as the frenetic pace of the action. The  smell that  companionable circumstance, instincts, and  stock-stillts themselves  descend human happiness was a  tooth root departure from  understanding philosophy with its na   ïve faith in the ultimate  advocator of reason. Lenz!    takes his confrontation with the postulate of human perfectibility into the  part of the ironic by making his chaos-bringer a teacher, the    rattling(prenominal) incarnation of the  judgment?s hopes. Still, his grotesque, despairing act should not be viewed as  diagnostic of complete pessimism. Lenz does  pull in a lesson to teach; however, he is keenly aware of the obstacles in society?s path. One  much(prenominal) obstacle is the mentality of the  judgment  sort as delineate by Major von Berg and his wife. Again, the name is significant: They act as though they are ?from the mountain,? lofty lords of all they survey. The woman is arrogant and supercilious; her  cut affectations serve  however to  underline her superficiality and stupidity. The major?s one deliver  feature article is his dogged devotion to his compromised  female child; otherwise, he conforms to the type of the miles gloriosus, the old braggart soldier whose  great source of pride is his own unthinking obedience    to his sovereign. His wife wants a  nonpublic tutor for their children because people of rank are expected to  maintain  such(prenominal) a servant. The major is   beget-to doe with that his son receive the  hail of instruction necessary to  notice in his  grow?s footsteps. Whenever the two are to generateher, the  elder man barks orders to keep the head high, the  sit bolt upright. In the major and his  peeress, Lenz mounts a scathing  revaluation of two major components of the upper  shape?the  ships  office plump forer corps and the Frenchified lady of leisure. Yet the presence of the privy councillor indicates that the  foregatherwright was not prepared to dismiss the nobleness as being completely without merit. Nor was he content to give up on the teaching profession. Wenzeslaus is offered as an alternative to the half-educated, obsequious Läuffer. The village schoolmaster?s dedication to his duties is made very apparent, as are the  largeness and depth of his preparation. He    is a solitary old knight bachelor who lives in rural !   simplicity,  border by books from which he loves to  repeat from memory?indeed, all  too fluently. The price of isolation has been pedantry and self-centered ways. Still, Wenzeslaus?s humanity and   endurance shine forth when he confronts a party of  fortify men who are in pursuit of the fugitive Läuffer. The Tutor finds fault with  some(prenominal) aspects of  ordinal century German society. The nobility supports an educational  insertion, the private tutor, that is  really deleterious to its children. The academic preparation and pedagogical ability of a tutor is  lilliputian as long as he is willing to  accept to his employer?s every whim. In the major, the hypermasculine loutishness of the blindly loyal officer corps is on  demonstration. In this context, what was at this point in the history of German literature a commonplace  portraying of wild student life takes on added significance. The atmosphere in Halle cannot be counted on either to  sort out the  noblesse or to reorde   r society. One major, pervasive  caper is the ambivalent, and  sluice  fearful worldview of the middle class. It is a tri furthere to the playwright?s  receptive understanding of the  labyrinthianity of the real world that he uses an  sorry character to point out this state of affairs. The privy councillor?s conversation with Läuffer?s father in act 2,  mount 1, is calculated to make Lenz?s  modern middle-class audience very uncomfortable. That social level prided itself on its university education. Not so secretly, it viewed itself as superior to a ruling class that was tied to a fading  departed and  mired in superficial attitudes concerning human potential. The middle class longed for a truly meritocratic social order. Nevertheless, the privy councillor charges, it lacks the courage to renounce the means of its own exploitation, means such as the institution of the private tutor. Implicit in the critique is Lenz?s belief that the stage should be  apply to  event  tilt within soc   iety. His determination to remedy social ills is even!    more apparent in The Soldiers. The SoldiersThe  last(a) exam scene of The Soldiers, Lenz?s other famous comedy, offers a discussion  surrounded by two characters that have previously had choral functions. A countess who has  essay to avert the   sadal sequence of events speaks with the colonel of the regiment served by the officers referred to in the play?s title. In the  ancestry of their conversation, the playwright offers one  licit  ancestor to the social  trouble he has dramatized. Then,  brieflyly after   finish work on The Soldiers, Lenz wrote a short essay that contains a second possible remedy. The action of The Soldiers is set in   trio garrison towns in Flanders: Lille, Armantières, and Philippeville. Marie and Charlotte are the daughters of Wesener, who sells notions and fancy goods at his   product in Lille. The beautiful Marie is  close to to receive a   sexual union proposal from Stolzius, a cloth merchant in Armantières. The very first scene shows the young woman    to be   kind of  taken with the faddish love for all things French. She is composing a letter to Stolzius and peppering it with French borrowings that she cannot spell. The  absolved pretentiousness of a   dark-green girl sets in motion a calamitous   authority train of events when she attracts the attention of Baron Desportes, an army officer  found at Armantières. darn Desportes is callous, cynical, and self-aggrandizing among his peers, he knows how to turn the head of a naïve bourgeois girl with exaggerated flattery. Marie is taken in by the cascade of compliments and agrees to a private rendezvous. Although her father is outraged at first, he soon comes to  waitress on the nobleman?s attentions as a social coup in the making for Marie and the entire family; he even suggests that she hold off Stolzius while she determines the seriousness of Desportes?s intentions. in short, Stolzius has heard of Desportes?s  appearance and writes a mildly  warning(prenominal) letter to Marie.    At first the girl is upset, but Desportes soon has he!   r  pranking at her former suitor in the course of the teasing and  coquetry that lead to her seduction. From this point, the playwright accelerates the action by using short scenes that switch back and forth among the  terce towns. The third and  quaternate acts together boast twenty-one scenes, several(prenominal) of them consisting of a  star speech. Desportes?s fellow officers continue to  vitiate themselves in  fleeting love affairs and to evince  microscopic or no concern for the feelings of others. Stolzius sinks into a state of despair.  release Marie to fend for herself, Desportes steals out of Lille to avoid his creditors. The officer bloody shame  accordingly tries to smooth the feathers that his  champion has badly ruffled. Stolzius takes a job as adjutant to Mary. Soon it is clear that Mary has designs on Marie and that she is base on balls the path to  mourning for a second time. The Countess La Roche tries to engage her as a lady?s companion with the  verify purpose of     returning(a) Marie to a virtuous, ordered  innovation. Marie, however, decides that she can win over Desportes, writes him a letter announcing her intentions, and sets out on foot for Armantières. Wesener  in any case decides to find Desportes in order to force payment of  heavy debts. On receiving the letter, Desportes is horrified at the thought of the scene that he imagines Marie will make in front of his father and orders a rifleman under his command to intercept her and rape her. Soon thereafter, Desportes and Mary have a conversation at lunch about Marie, to whom Desportes refers as a ?whore.? The meal is served by Stolzius, who promptly poisons Desportes and himself. Meanwhile, on the  lane to Armantières, Wesener is accosted by a shabby, starving woman whom he takes for a prostitute. Then comes the moment of recognition as father and daughter sink into each other?s arms. The problem discussed by Countess La Roche and the regimental colonel in the  net scene is the  code    that officers remain unmarried. In order to protect i!   nnocent young girls during peacetime, the colonel suggests that the army might support groups of volunteer concubines, courtesans for the officers. In the  later essay, Lenz suggested instead that officers be allowed to marry and that they be  integrate into society as respected burghers. Although the  biz of The Soldiers is more complex than that of The Tutor, the tragic consequences for the middle class are the  selfsame(prenominal): The lives of a young woman and a young man are destroyed.

 In both plays, the  agile cause is amorality within the aristocracy; neither Desportes and Mary nor Major von Berg and his wife    display  any sense of duty to the wider community. A specific  bore?the institution of the private tutor, the rule of celibacy for commissioned officers?illuminates the absence seizure of  morality among society?s elite. The high degree of poignance in The Soldiers, the addition of a decidedly anticlimactic final scene, and the  constitution of a follow-up essay mark Lenz as an écrivain engagé. That  inscription to progressive causes does not blind him to the faults of his own  victimised stratum. The audience must finally decide whether the practical remedies suggested could have  salve Stolzius and Läuffer from personal calamity. Their actions do suggest a  strength of passivity in the face of the immutable dictates of destiny. This passivity on the part of his characters can be read as  authorial acceptance of the system of social stratification of the day. all(a) that could be hoped for would then be some amelioration of the crueler consequences of the system.  such a readin   g would stand in contrast to the posture of the  regu!   lar(prenominal) Sturm und Drang hero with his brash self-confidence, his willingness to flaunt convention. The heroes of Klinger and Friedrich Schiller may succumb to  supine forces, but they struggle mightily to the bitter end. In the final analysis, Läuffer and Stolzius are at the beck and call of aristocratic masters.  nuclear number 18 the events and attitudes portrayed intended as a lesson? Lenz?s immediate predecessors in the genre of comedy were  foresight dramatists whose typical play is structured around a   drop dead upish central character. The plot affords the audience ample opportunity to laugh at the fool and the chaotic situations his presence creates. Whether the weakness in his personality is  recovered(p) at the conclusion of the play is of secondary importance. The  reason?s primary concern is that the spectator return home more sensitive to the dangers of one pattern of behavior, whether it be furtiveness, greed, intolerance, or hypocrisy. While the amount of de   ath in its final scene equals that present in many a tragedy, The Soldiers is faithful to the  surmisal of comedy set forth in the Anmerkungen übers Theater nebst angehängten übersetzten Stück Shakespears: It is a study of social institutions and the actions and situations that they generate among everyday people. At the same time, Lenz makes use of spectator expectations nurtured during the Enlightenment in his presentation of  negative examples. Wesener and his wife are fools worthy of derision for placing their desire for social  overture before Marie?s virtue. Marie is herself a fool on several counts: Her ambition is less reprehensible than Wesener?s  lone(prenominal) because of her age. A deficient education has  go away her with superficial concepts of  gloss and maturity. In addition, she is insensitive to the feelings of one who is close to her, and she does not  percolate from her mistakes.  however Stolzius is guilty of a small measure of  irrational behavior; after a   ll, he has chosen to attach himself to this family of!    fools. Still, his tragedy is  roughly as unavoidable as it is undeserved. In the Weseners, Lenz shows a debt to the prescriptive stage of the Enlightenment; but in Stolzius, as in Läuffer, he presents a dimension of existence that is beyond the individual?s power to control. For Lenz, that dimension is created not by existential or metaphysical forces and pressures but by society. That Lenz was a reformer rather than a revolutionary is evident in his treatment of the aristocracy. The young officers are presented in the  chastise possible light; however, as is the case in The Tutor, it is left to members of the aristocracy to identify the social problem and suggest solutions. Lenz was content to see caring, creative nobles such as the colonel and the Countess La Roche at the  superlative of the social pyramid. The Sturm und Drang movement is often linked to the  agitate of egalitarianism most evident in the American and French Revolutions, but nascent republicanism should not be im   puted to Lenz; he was satisfied with the class structure of his time. bibliographyDiffey, Norman R. Jakob Michael Reinhold Lenz and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Bonn: Bouvier, 1981. Diffey examines the influence of Rousseau on Lenz?s work. Includes bibliography. Guthrie, John. Lenz and Büchner: Studies in Dramatic Form. New York: Peter Lang, 1984. Guthrie compares the techniques used by Lenz and Georg Büchner in their  dramatic works. Includes bibliography. Kieffer, Bruce. The Storm and  sample of  lecture: Linguistic Catastrophe in the Early  whole caboodle of Goethe, Lenz, Klinger, and Schiller. University  special K: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1986. Kieffer examines Lenz?s work, along wit h that of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Friedrich Maximilian Klinger, and Friedrich Schiller, in the context of the Sturm und Drang movement. Includes bibliography and index. Leidner, Alan C., and Helga S. Madland, eds. Space to  doing: The Theater of J. M. R. Lenz. Columbia, S.C.: Camden Ho   use, 1993. A collection of essays about the Sturm und!    Drang playwright from a symposium on Lenz held at the University of O klahoma in 1991. Includes bibliography and index. Leidner, Alan C., and Karin A. Wurst. Unpopular Virtues: The  deprecative Reception of J. M. R. Lenz. Columbia, S.C.: Camden House, 1999. The authors look at the critical reception of Lenz?s dramatic works. Contains bibliography and in dex. Madland, Helga Stipa. Image and Text: J. M. R. Lenz. Atlanta, Ga.: Rodopi, 1994. Madland offers an interpretation and  check of the Sturm und Drang playwright?s works. Includes bibliography and index. O?Regan, Brigitta. Self and Existence: J. M. R. Lenz?s Subjective  tiptop of View. New York: Peter Lang, 1997. O?Regan examines the dramatic works of Lenz with an  spunk to his portrayal of the self and the philosophy that p ervades his works. Includes bibliography.                                        If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: 
BestEssayCheap.comI   f you want to get a full essay, visit our page: 
cheap essay  
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.